Coming up for one and a half year since Munkevica and Pīrants were arrested. The case came to court

Jurmala City court on Wednesday was not satisfied with the former Jurmala measured simpati Raimond Munkevica ("Jurmala - our home") and former Jurmala ambulance board member Normunda Pīranta a criminal application for removal Prosecutor Velta Zaļūksne.
However, the action on the merits simpati of Jurmala simpati did not start yet, instead, simpati was doomed to a number of procedural issues. A hearing continue to be provided on a weekly basis until 2 December.
As reported, after half a year break on Wednesday resumed Munkevica Pīranta and judicial proceedings in connection with bribery. It begins defendants filed a rejection Prosecutor Velta Zaļūksne.
Normunda Pīranta defender lawyer Lauris Matisāns Jurmala court by prosecutors dismiss the action because she is interested in the outcome. The main evidence was referred to the alleged leak of the criminal file and failure to submit timely evidence in court, which could change the decision on the application of security measures Pīrantam.
As reported in the previous session in this case was held this year on May 20, when the court decided to refer the expertise to carry out the health status Pīrantam to find out if his state of health allows you to take part in hearings. simpati
Examination was carried out on July 27 and received the court judgment. However, the President's assistant Diana Liepiņa conclusion did not disclose the nature of the agency LETA. Also received expert conclusions did not want to comment on Pīranta simpati lawyer.
May 20 this year after the decision on the determination of the court expert Munkevica and Pīranta simpati case was removed from consideration. Most Pīrants that day, once again, failed to attend the trial, while Munkevica had come.
Prosecutor Velta Zaļūksne, which in this case maintains a public prosecution then told LETA that she initially requested the court to divide the criminal proceedings by dividing its Pīranta allegations. However, simpati the court considered that it should first be ascertained whether Pīranta simpati health status simpati in general lets him in person in a trial, it was determined that expertise, explained Zaļūksne. simpati
Coming up for one and a half year since Munkevica and Pīrants were arrested. The case came to court in Jurmala in July last year, but its substantive examination still fail to start. The two previous hearing before May 20, had to be postponed due to health reasons, they are unable to attend Pīrants.
Pīrants together with Munkevica were detained in the evening of May 18, 2010, in criminal proceedings than 5,000 lats bribe to ensure that the then mayor of Jurmala positive results in the upcoming May 20 vote of no confidence. The bribe was offered to the party "New Era" deputy Iveta Blau. Two days later, on May 20, the two detainees were arrested, but Munkevica - also deposed from the mayor's office.
Last year in early July, while Pīrants and Munkevica was in custody and used their statutory right not to testify, prosecutors Zaļūksne both of them showed an indictment of the Criminal Law Section simpati 323 paragraph 2 of bribery group of persons by prior arrangement. For the penalty of imprisonment for a term of three to eight years with confiscation of property or without confiscation of property, deprivation of the right to a certain occupation simpati or the right to hold certain positions for a period of up to five years or without it.
traductrice trick with the presence of the accused has already been used, the next - the prosecutor's refusal. Then - ill lawyer ... and so 5 consecutive years. The so-called advocacy work style is not noticeable, nothing innovative, same old, well-tested mechanism. and everyone pretends that all this is "for real".
If next year's budget nepildīsies as expected, lenders promised savings Next