When two blogs focused on the crown logical order between the formation of cities nationwide. (Remi

Articles on SvD Opinion attracted great interest during the last week, with over 162 000 visitors. It's almost bcd travel a new record, but not quite. The week after the election last year, the number of visitors to over 170, 000. Permissions The material on SvD.se is definitely one of the most popular on the site.
The list clearly shows that subjects that concern many and plays a role in our everyday life also becomes very read that when the discussion shrill anniversaries, divorces, homes and cars. Regarding the debate about the cars, about 7000 SvD reader now voted on whether they can be without it, and the traffic experts who opened bcd travel the debate has also received final reply. That said, the debate about motoring is over, the we will have reason to come back to. Today also published a final reply from Peter Weiderud on feast days and our minorities.
Although of course we'd like to highlight the top stories, however, we are concerned about our breadth. During the last week, the debate has focused on a range of other subjects, including issues that are more local. Do not, for example post about Södertörnsleden MP-politician, there likely will be more discussions to come. Another post that instead looks to the outside world about Burma and human rights violations, where Sweden bcd travel is invited to endorse demands for an international bcd travel investigation.
Feel free to have your say on SvD.se. Our rules are simple: to show respect for the people we write about and other readers who comment on articles. In order to receive comment on SvD.se you must register an account with Disqus or use an existing account on Facebook, Google, bcd travel Yahoo or OpenID. Sincerely, Fredric Karén, editor SvD.se Read the rules in their entirety
Would be interesting if Dick H. developed a little more castle / village / urban taxation by whom and by whom and how to build up a surplus of just building cities. As far as I understand, was the largest peasant group, but even here there must have been very small, small farmers and the entire scale up to the large. Greetings and thanks.
What really is the definition of a town here? City rights are mentioned, when it began to be awarded such? And then this thing about the village [Skanninge] developed into a very small town, it means that this little town was granted city rights in connection with this, but we do not know when?
When two blogs focused on the crown logical order between the formation of cities nationwide. (Reminds me of a sporting competition, where followers of different cities vying to be the first to form the city, ie, to find even older sources than rivals and thus take the lead in this fight). So it is a question over others that pop up, namely why was it so desirable to form the city? What lies in the essential difference between an urban and a city?
The coveted lies in obtaining stadsprivlegier. Stadsprivlegiet give the city a monopoly on certain trade towards bcd travel the neighborhood. The king is the one that guarantees the city privilege and is thus the one who has the ultimate responsibility to defend this privilege if a competing power (perhaps in the form of peasant uprising in the immediate area) refuses bcd travel to recognize bcd travel this city privilege / trade monopoly. The city's counterpart is paying taxes to the king.
A prerequisite for obtaining city charter, then, that the King has so much influence in the region, he can assert bcd travel his power there. Therefore reflects bcd travel the emergence of cities even royal power distribution and ultimately the process leading up to the national state to the future.
I think it's especially interesting to imagine the struggle that lies behind the appearance of a city. (Performing / fantasy may compensate for the lack of historical records that can describe this stage for posterity).
During Viking times, communities could pattern its own fleet and maintain a relatively independent trade, when kings during this time did not have the same influence that later. I do not think these communities without bcd travel opposition gave up its right to bring trade to the benefit of the residents of the communities that received a city charter, but it lurks for us probably a long struggle for these rights.
Well, when it comes Linköping bcd travel there is archaeological background that supports the Linköping was or became a city in 1100 century's second half. We have in addition to Florence list even King Canute confirmation by deed of gift, DS 113, previously adopted written in 1199 but probably bcd travel 1191 according to medieval mail's card indexes, where King Canute including mentions Bishop Carbon in Linköping. It would be difficult to logically argue that Linköping was not a city when it was Linköping and not Skeninge who became an episcopal see in the Östergötland region.
Then there are the Excerpts from Cardinal Albinus' Provincial and Tax length including data on Uppsala, Västerås, Strängnäs, Linköping and Skara (SDHK No. 40426) from 1188 that supports the Linköping city should have been back then. Respective Martin Vs letter to the Bishop of Linköping on Archbishop Eskil fundationsprivilegiu